top of page

What are the audit risks of the cryptocurrency industry ?




Auditing cryptocurrencies presents unique challenges due to their specific nature and the largely unregulated environment they operate in. Here are some of the main audit risks associated with the cryptocurrency industry:


Lack of Official Guidance: The absence of relevant official guidance from standard setters dealing with emerging issues related to cryptocurrencies is a major challenge for auditors. Neither the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the Auditing Standards Board (ASB), nor the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) have issued formal guidance for accounting or auditing cryptocurrency, which leaves auditors to rely on concept statements, principle-based accounting, and non-authoritative information.


Competence and Resources: The audit firm's requisite competence in cryptocurrency to recognize risks and design appropriate auditing procedures is a significant factor. The firm also needs access to resources such as the appropriate mix of personnel and technology. The absence of consistent legal and regulatory guidance for cryptocurrency increases the challenge of determining whether the audit firm has the required competence.


Client Competence and Business Purpose: The client's requisite competence in cryptocurrency to recognize and mitigate associated risks is vital. Furthermore, the alignment of the client's cryptocurrency transactions with business purpose and strategy is also crucial. If these factors are high risk, the audit firm should consider the additional resources and expertise required to provide an audit opinion with reasonable assurance.


Existence and Ownership of Cryptocurrency: Verifying the existence of cryptocurrency assets and the ownership rights to those assets can be challenging. The digital nature of these assets, and the fact that they are maintained in a decentralized and distributed ledger, can make it difficult for auditors to confirm the existence of the assets using traditional methods.


Valuation of Cryptocurrency: The volatility of cryptocurrency prices can make it challenging to accurately value these assets for financial reporting purposes. The lack of intrinsic value of these assets and the price being driven by speculation increase the risk of material misstatement in an account balance.


Cryptocurrency Exchange Controls: The entity may use a cryptocurrency exchange that lacks effective controls over the transactions it enters into on behalf of the entity or over the balances of cryptocurrency maintained in the entity's accounts. This poses a high-impact risk.


Security of Private Keys: Unauthorized access to the client's private key, loss of a private key, or misrepresentation of ownership of a private key pose significant risks as they can lead to loss or theft of the client's cryptocurrency.


Anonymity of Parties to Blockchain Transactions: The high level of anonymity in blockchain transactions can make it difficult to identify related parties, potentially leading to fraudulent activities or misrepresentation of transactions.


Internal Controls: The lack of robust internal controls in client companies dealing with cryptocurrencies can increase audit risks. Auditors cannot test controls that do not exist, which argues for the internal audit profession to become more proactive in designing effective internal controls in crypto environments.


Complexity of Cryptographic Keys and Custody Arrangements: The complexity of cryptographic keys raises questions around who actually controls an asset. Custody arrangements can differ greatly, further complicating the auditing process.


In conclusion, auditing cryptocurrencies requires a high level of expertise

Comentários


bottom of page